Friday 29 February 2008 by

It’s one thing to re-brand and sell, quite another to call it your own, disable features and charge for adding them back, then heave support back onto the open source community.

Legal (if they provide the source to all their clients under GPL), but positively shameful.

Update

It turns out that we have a combination of two misunderstandings:

  1. money was paid for a site’s design two years ago, not a content management system or extended support
  2. a misunderstanding of what the proper way to go about branding is

I consider this fully resolved. If you have any questions, please contact me privately.

Explanation of the Update

For those that have been following this from the beginning, and are a little confused…

As stated above, it was a misunderstanding. I talked with them personally, and there was not only a reasonable explanation but a sincere apology. They have also made corrections to their site to clarify what it is they are actually offering, and they now understand the correct way to go about offering a customized Txp install for their clients.

Hence, the links were removed. If I believed that their corrections were only the result of “getting caught” (which is what actual thieves/site rippers tend to do), I would not have removed them. I am fully satisfied that it wasn’t intentional.